|
urrent
research on tissue regeneration has evolved from a decades-old study on
bone growth. Beginning in 1964, NIDCR (then NIDR) grantee Marshall Urist
discovered that bone, which had been demineralized and dried into a powder,
could be implanted into the muscle of a rabbit and stimulate the growth
of new bone. Urist and collaborators later determined that the active
component was proteinaceous and dubbed it bone morphogenetic protein (BMP).
This landmark finding started the race to further identify the responsible
growth factors that were present in the bone. Dr. Hari Reddi, an NIDCR
scientist and grantee, took a closer look at the demineralized bone "matrix",
which consists mainly of a network of type 1 collagen. Reddi was able
to extract a soluble protein component of the matrix, but neither the
soluble component nor the residual collagen matrix could induce new bone
growth on their own. The extract had to be recombined with the matrix
in order to induce new bone. The finding proved that a soluble osteogenic
fraction and a solid carrier were necessary factors for bone regeneration
and helped pave the way for working out the structure of bone morphogenetic
proteins (BMPs).
Over a ton of bone was needed to provide scientists with a sufficient
quantity of the osteogenic fraction for amino acid analysis. The sequencing
results revealed striking similarities between components of the osteogenic
fraction and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß). Initial studies
by Reddi and other investigators identified three different BMPs that
fit into the TGF-ß superfamily of proteins. Today, over 15 members
of the BMP family have been isolated and produced in the laboratory through
recombinant DNA technology. It is now also known that BMPs are produced
by tissues other than bone and may be instrumental in the formation of
the kidney, central and peripheral nervous systems, liver, lung, heart,
gonads, skin, and teeth.
Research by NIDCR and other scientists revealed a "bone healing
cascade", in which BMPs are believed to play an instrumental role.
The natural healing of a broken bone occurs in a series of steps. Undifferentiated
stem cells present in the marrow are directed by BMPs to multiply and
become specialized cells that produce cartilage (chondrocytes) or bone
(osteoblasts). Under the right set of conditions, these stem cells called
marrow stromal cells (MSCs) can also be coaxed into forming muscle or
tissues that support blood formation or even fat production. In the bone
fracture-healing pathway, chondrocytes produce a cartilage framework that
is eventually replaced with bone formed by the osteoblasts.
Animal studies have revealed some of the requirements for using BMPs
to reproduce the healing cascade at sites that are resistant to normal
healing. BMPs must be incorporated into a carrier that holds the molecules
in place so that they can react with progenitor cells. Several different
carriers have been tested with varying degrees of success. Early attempts
used either collagenous bone matrix or hydroxy-apatite, a compound of
calcium and phosphate that is similar to the mineral phase of bone. Using
natural bone matrix carries the risk of disease and immune rejection,
while synthetic hydroxyapatite is not biodegradable and new bone that
is formed does not merge well with surrounding bone. An interesting finding
from an early NIDCR study was that the pore size and overall shape of
the hydroxy-apatite scaffolding was critical in determining the efficiency
of bone induction. This work demonstrated the need for a well-defined
three-dimensional structure for presenting BMPs, but also pointed out
some of the shortcomings of existing materials.
|
Mythology, Evolution, and Tissue Regeneration
|

The legend
of Prometheus suggests the ancient Greeks were aware of the
liver’s natural regenerative powers. This illustration depicts
an eagle feeding on the eternally regenerating liver of Prometheus.
Reprinted with permission from Science 1997 American Association
for
the Advancement of Science.
|
Although the technology may be just emerging, regeneration
of body parts is hardly a new concept. Through the myth of Prometheus,
the ancient Greeks are credited with knowledge of the liver's natural
regenerative powers. As punishment for stealing the secret of fire
from the gods of Olympus, Prometheus was condemned to having a portion
of his liver eaten each day by an eagle. His liver would regenerate
overnight, providing the eagle with an endless food source and Prometheus
with eternal torture. The regenerative capability of a real living
creature was recorded as early as 330 BC, when Aristotle observed
that a lizard could grow back the lost tip of its tail. In the late
1700s, the scientist Spallanzani reported that a newt could regenerate
a complete limb. Since then, the study of regeneration in lower
life forms has laid the groundwork for understanding the regenerative
capabilities and potential of humans.
Bacteria and the single-celled protozoans regenerate
complete organisms with each cell division. Many multicellular invertebrates
also exhibit extensive regenerative abilities. When cut in half,
the at-worm Planaria can grow a new head from one piece and a new
tail from the other. However, progression up the evolutionary ladder
is generally accompanied by a reduction in regenerative capacity.
Limb of Newt, Horn of Stag, Wing of Bat
Two of nature’s
true regenerators |
The pinnacle of vertebrate regeneration takes place
in the urodele amphibians (salamanders and newts). When a newt's
forearm or hindleg is severed, a new one forms in about six weeks.
If half of the lower jaw is lost, it grows back complete with new
teeth. The process through which this new growth takes place provides
insights into some key differences between amphibian regeneration
and mammalian wound repair.
After a newt limb is amputated, the wound is sealed
over by the rapid migration of epithelial cells from surrounding
tissue. Mesodermal cells beneath the epidermis lose their differentiated
character and reproduce to form a conical mound of cells called
the blastema. The blastemal cells eventually redifferentiate into
the cartilage, connective tissue, and muscle of the new limb. Signals
exchanged between the epidermal and mesodermal cells control the
reversal of the differentiated state and subsequent regeneration.
Much speculation has centered on whether a similar process can be
duplicated in mammals.
While mammals have retained the ability to regenerate
certain tissues, such as liver, they lack the ability to grow new
limbs through blastema formation. But has major regenerative capacity
in mammals been lost over the course of evolution,
or is it lying dormant waiting for its potential to be unlocked?
The basic ability may still be present even though the appropriate
trigger mechanisms may not be. Assuming that the same genes that
form structures in the developing embryo are also responsible for
their regeneration in the adult, the task of scientists is to determine
the nature of the blockades and to remove or bypass them. There
are several tantalizing examples where mammals have not relinquished
the ability to regenerate. The most conspicuous example of mammalian
regeneration is the annual replacement of antlers in deer. This
is the only example of complete regeneration of mammalian appendages.
Other notable examples include bats being able to plug holes in
their wing membranes; rabbits, domestic cats, and bats filling in
ear holes, and regrowth of the tips of mouse toes. The prospects
for human regeneration were greatly enhanced by the discovery that
amputated fingertips could grow back in young children.
Even though humans and other mammals cannot on
their own regenerate teeth, limbs, and organs, specific tissues
possess considerable recuperative powers. Mammals are continuously
replacing cells in tissues derived from the protective layer of
surface epithelium. Appendages such as skin, nails, and hair
grow almost continuously. Teeth are constantly replaced
in lower vertebrates, but in mammals are shed once and then replaced
with a permanent set. However, if the roots remain open as in the
case of rodents, the teeth may continue to grow throughout the life
of the animal. Other tissues with tremendous cell turnover include
blood, intestinal epithelium, and liver. In the intestine, the entire
epithelium of each villus turns over every 2 3 days. It is estimated
that the total daily production of the various blood cells is in
the order of 3 x 1,011 cells for a 150 pound person.
In most vertebrates, true regeneration is limited
to a very few tissues, such as liver, bone, and skeletal muscle.
Liver cells come closest to mimicking the urodele regeneration phenomenon,
in which differentiated cells revert to an embryonic dividing state
and then differentiate once more into specialized cells. Mature
liver cells only partially dedifferentiate, however. In response
to tissue destruction, liver cells, which normally don't reproduce,
undergo rapid cell division. In true Promethean style, these remarkable
cells continue to carry out their normal metabolic functions while
multiplying to replace lost tissue. A rat can replace two-thirds
of its liver in 5 to 7 days. A baboon liver transplanted into a
human will double in size to reach that of a human liver within
a week.
Other tissues rely on stem or progenitor cells
undifferentiated embryonic-type cells that are present in most,
perhaps all, adult tissues. Stems cells are dormant until called
into action by the proper set of chemical signals, whereupon they
differentiate to form the required tissues. However, tissues differ
greatly in the effectiveness of their stem cells. Of the major tissues
that form the craniofacial complex, (nerve, muscle, skin, bone,
blood, cartilage) bone is the most versatile in its regenerative
capabilities.
|
The search for an ideal scaffolding material continues to be a hot research
area. Such material should provide a sufficiently rigid framework to fill
the defect, yet degrade after the new tissue forms, and leave a product
that is fully integrated with surrounding tissue. More recent studies
have looked at BMPs incorporated into collagen gels, as well as biodegradable
polymers like polylactic acid (PLA) or polyglycolic acid (PGA), the basic
suture materials. BMPs, incorporated into various matrices, have been
subjected to intensive preclinical and clinical research for both orthopedic
and craniofacial applications. The sites investigated have included the
calvaria (skullcap), jaw, and palate, where nonhealing defects were created
in different animal models, including primates.
Scientists at the University of Michigan have taken the growth factor-biodegradable
matrix combination a step further. Instead of incorporating a protein
factor into the matrix, they substituted a plasmid containing the gene
for the growth factor. The reasoning behind these "gene-activated
matrices (GAMS)" was that a protein is quickly degraded, but a gene
would get incorporated into a host cell and remain active over a longer
period of time. When put to the test, BMP GAMS have been able to repair
long bone defects in rats and dogs.
Hydrogels are a new generation of matrix materials currently being tested
for cartilage and bone regeneration. The method is based on polymers that
can house progenitor cells and growth factors, and then be injected into
the repair site, thus avoiding surgical intervention. An external light
source is used to trigger "photopolymerization" of the injected
liquid so that a solid structure is established to support the repair
process. An NIDCR grantee is currently looking at this approach for repairing
craniofacial structures and treating dental defects, like poor bonding
between teeth and under-lying jawbone.

Next
Chapter
| Biomimetics
and Tissue Engineering -Table of Contents
|